Per!
Welcome to Wittenberg!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: xpb on May 30, 2023, 02:19:02 PMBetter late than never:Quote from: Dame Litz Cjantscheir, UrN on May 17, 2023, 01:30:20 PMLooks good - though when I get a minute, I'd like to give it a more "grammatical" tidy-up and shall post it here before it goes to a vote.
Much appreciated @Dame Litz it would be great have that available for l'Etats by the start of the month of June. I will sort out the homestead claim and tourism office location and write that up for confirmation as well. Will be traveling a bit (again) but should have access to Witt.
xpb
Quote from: Ian Plätschisch on May 18, 2023, 05:32:08 PMIt's arguable that this bill would mean Senators who didn't vote three times over the course of their entire tenure would be kicked out, which would be strange.
MCs get replaced every election (even if the same individuals return), but even when Senators get re-elected there is no equivalent "hard break" in their tenure that would cause the strikes to reset.
Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN on May 16, 2023, 09:56:53 PMWHEREAS there is now a vacancy on the Uppermost Cort;You have one too many 1's after El Lex G :) .
AND WHEREAS throughout most of Talossan history, the Uppermost Cort was set at 3 members;
AND WHEREAS that tradition was broken at the time the old Magistrate's Cort was folded into the CpI;
AND WHEREAS we now have a chance to restore this tradition;
AND WHEREAS the effect of this bill will be to confirm the CpI at its current size of one Senior Judge and two Puisne Judges, as foreseen in OrgLaw VIII.3;
AND WHEREAS under the provisions of OrgLaw VIII.3, this resizing will have to be approved by a 2/3 majority of the Cosa, and then approved by the same margin again in the next Cosa;
BE IT ENACTED by the King, Cosa and Senäts of Talossa in Ziu assembled that El Lexhatx G.1.1.1 is deleted.
Quote from: Sir Txec dal Nordselvă, UrB on February 06, 2023, 01:16:49 PMI fully understand what you're trying to say, but current legal issues aside (which are within the powers of the Ziu to amend, if they see fit) - I do agree with you that we need clarification of what is or isn't possible with the current census/database system so the Ziu can look at alternatives, and if need be, pass legislation to that effect.Quote from: Dame Litz Cjantscheir, UrN on February 06, 2023, 01:11:17 PMHowever (and I am by no means an IT expert here, so please correct me if I'm wrong), I don't envision adding one text box to the current census programme/file/database should be too much of an issue?
I don't believe this is a problem either. I'm just stating that it'd be beneficial for me to explore that option. The other ideas suggested I don't think will be feasible given current law.
However, we run up against privacy law here as well. I can collect the skills inventory, I can't share what they said if it identifies them.
Quote from: Sir Txec dal Nordselvă, UrB on February 06, 2023, 12:16:13 PMThe responses are not tied to individuals, but that is a factor in determining if a citizen is going to lose their citizenship and that IS tracked in the current database. MPF would have to manually change everyone's database file if we used an alternate means.I appreciate what the SoS is saying, major changes should be discussed - which is why we have the Hopper to try and thrash things out, to see what is possible and what isn't.
I'm only asking that when major changes are planned, we determine AS PART OF THE CHANGE how we will accomplish it.
Quote from: Viteu on February 03, 2023, 04:52:19 PM@Dame Litz Cjantscheir, UrN , what say you?