Benveneschti, Max!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Welcome to Wittenberg!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Françal I. Lux on Yesterday at 08:08:24 AMSure let's try it! I appreciate your help :)
F. I. Lux

Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on November 02, 2025, 12:05:29 PMSo how about it? Should we get started figuring out the questions, and maybe we can do it on the ninth?
Suggested rules:
Five questions from each party. The moderators (His Majesty and Sir Ian) may request questions be rephrased before they accept them. After the questions are finalized, the moderators will decide on the order in which they will be asked. They will alternate, but otherwise questions on the same topic will be together.
During the debate, no one will interrupt. Candidates will be afforded three minutes apiece on each topic. Moderators will decide who goes first for each question.
The goal is to help citizens make an informed choice. All decisions should reflect that goal.
If Mic'halgh and Sir Ian send me their preferred email address, I'll them to a Google Doc I started for this.
Quote from: GV on November 02, 2025, 09:18:45 PMQuote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN-GC on October 21, 2025, 08:19:37 PMQuote from: Joseph Morris on October 21, 2025, 08:17:28 PMDang! I didn't know we had all this history!
I suggest this as beginning reading material
It was on about 23 March 2004 Ben Madison began falsely accusing Kane Dal Nava on Wittenberg of domestic abuse.
This is the most important event in Talossan history since the start of the Cybercit Era and is left out of the page Miestra links here.
Quote from: Françal I. Lux on November 03, 2025, 11:20:48 PMIs there any way I can request to change or edit my coat of arms? I have no idea what I was thinking when I made that mess
F. I. Lux
Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN-GC on October 29, 2025, 08:32:53 PMEspecially when one considers that he is purposefully and blatantly misquoting you, and not even doing a good job of hiding it. That's twice now he's done it (emphasis mine):Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on October 29, 2025, 05:56:50 PMI think an issue with your "We are the Good and you are the Bad" view of TalossaI'm honestly surprised that you're that upset by a reference to the title of a 1966 spaghetti Western.
Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN-GC on July 29, 2025, 05:03:04 PMEnough of that. Onto "the Bad". Well, that's mildly unfair. Certainly not bad people. But bad politics.
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on October 27, 2025, 11:44:01 AMCan we agree not to lie about stuff, though?I don't know, can you?

Quote from: Istefan Perþonest on October 14, 2025, 09:56:21 PMI have an admittedly-odd hobby of reading old (1970s, 1980s) computer magazines. As I go along, I'll often see something that piques my curiosity, and so I'll do an Internet search for more tidbits about the item. Well, about a third of the time, the LLM box will confidently assert that the thing I just read about did not ever exist. Even when there's a directly-relevant search result a handful of items down.
Similarly, I tried, a few months ago, to have several LLMs perform a quite simple task -- take a list of the countries that are parties to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, take a list of countries by population, and give me the combined population of the countries that are members of the ICC. Every single time, the LLM crapped out. Even given explicit instructions on how to complete the task, a model would at most get a dozen countries in, and then quit in favor of some method of estimation. With results that were all over the map (as it were).
(Incidentally, Wolfram Alpha, which is not an LLM, will give you accurate-for-2023 stats for the member countries in the case of any number of organizations, including the ICC. Manually adding Ukraine and subtracting the Philippines is easy enough, and indicates that every LLM estimate was off by at least 10%, and usually more.)
I accordingly am of the opinion that the thing LLMs are most suited for is enabling students to cheat on their homework. Facile regurgitation of shallow knowledge, an inability or unwillingness to work, and an obligation to answer instead of saying "I don't know" -- LLMs do a great job of emulating a sixteen-year-old just trying to skate through a required class.