Quote from: Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP on Today at 05:18:15 AMAtx Ianesc, I'd say.

EDIT: I should add here that all the era names are incorrect as they follow English compounding syntax.

I think Iusti helped me with them a long time ago?  I didn't know any Talossan then.  I've swapped adjective and noun for now, and I'll look up to see if there's appropriate adjectives later.

So you can adjectify a noun with -esc or -escu (feminine nouns), then?

Quote from: Mic'haglh Autófil, O.Be on Yesterday at 09:57:03 PMDo we have them archived somewhere?

I think GV might have the only copies?  I remember I did see some, although there was too much Nazi stuff for me to want to seek out a lot more.  I think that was a phase of Ian von M's?

Quote from: Sir Lüc on June 22, 2025, 01:54:13 PMThe ones on the History page are more accurate, although the 2007 "modern" era arguably ended with Reunision and we could be considered to be in yet another era with the accession of King Txec.

I went ahead and followed this suggestion.  Making it an era from 2007 to 2024 under the reign of King John neatly encapsulates that period.  I called it the Johannine Era.  I need to figure out the Talossan for that, of course.  @Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP ... I'm hoping the answer isn't just making it possessive with sè, but since I don't know of a way to adjectivize a noun, I suspect that might be the answer.

I have added navigation to the bottom of each page, and a few other little improvements as they occur to me.  If anyone has any ideas or suggestions, please feel free to let me know.  I do plan on eventually making the forms for answers auto-check for correct answers, rather than making the reader do it, but that will have to wait for a later day.

Anyway, I started work on the next lesson, and it's partially complete.  We'll be working on translating into Talossan in different tenses, expanding significantly the number of things we can say.

https://talossan.net/lesson-five/

A future Lesson Six will be about error correction, I think.

A statute cannot override the Organic Law, even if it passed with a two-thirds majority.  The Organic Law doesn't provide for special super-statutes that supersede it.  I also believe that Cjantscheir v. the Ziu was decided without a full panel, so that it cannot be considered binding precedent (Org.VIII.6).

My suggestion would be to return the bill to the general Hopper and try to brainstorm some other solutions that might achieve your goal.  I'm not trying to oppose the general idea, but just pointing out an essential problem with the text.  After all, the law would quickly become really hard to follow if there were some provisions of el Lexhatx that were superior to all of the OrgLaw.

Yes, Your Majesty.

Quote from: Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP on July 07, 2025, 04:27:20 PMOne more thing: It should say "risguardéu", not "risguardeu".

EDIT: Also it still says "caumitans" in some of the examples when it should be "caums".

Thank you!  To express my gratitude, I have prominently linked your blog on a new "read more" page.  Please notify your hosting to expect a flood of new readers.

@Miestră Schivă, UrN-GC , I believe this one is also cleared and ready for primetime.

Nnnnnghhh...

Okay, thank you.  Some of those were just careless -- I'm sorry for not catching them myself.

I think I got all of that.  Thank you very much!

@Marcel Eðo Pairescu Tafial, UrGP , I believe I'm done with this lesson.  I also feel I might have made an error with my adverbs!

Thank you again for all of your help... would you mind taking a look?  No rush!

https://talossan.net/lesson-four/

Okay, the first half of this lesson is done.  It will have two exercises, and then some further practice.

https://talossan.net/lesson-four/

Quote from: mximo on July 06, 2025, 03:51:42 PMLouis Riel faced Parliamentary censure for his role in the Red River Rebellion, and was expelled from Parliament 16 April 1874.[11]

Lol the guys was kill by pendaison to protect is land...from English colonisation of Metis Land.
He is a national hero now...

This is what you have...

Old case...

No one use censure in Canada since then...

BTW the King is our figure head of stade without power but the constitution of 1867 still give him all the power. Their is something call ''Constitutionnelle convention '' where the law is still their but no one use it anymore...

But if something wrong happen go to the police and ask for an investigation.

I'm pretty busy now...

Do as you wish...

Mximo Carbonèl

Just last year, the Canadian House of Commons passed a bill to censure the developers of an app for ArriveCan: https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/arrivecan-contempt-parliament-1.7167513

They call it contempt of Parliament, but it's exactly the same thing.

I do think if you'll investigate the facts of the case, or look back at when you were told about them, you might see our motivation here. Breneir engaged in conduct that was wrong and gross but not criminal. That's why this bill doesn't impose any penalties or do anything besides express the opinion of our Ziu. That would be a bill of attainder, and illegal under the OrgLaw.

You're always talking yourself down, but a lot of people think you're great. You're a pretty smart guy.

If you want to try learning, I think that the lessons are pretty good so far. Start with lesson one and tell me how you do. Let me know if you need any help or if I made any mistakes!

Well, you're doing a great job.  Thank you.

Side note: the site is now averaging about 2,000 unique visitors a month -- and rising all the time!  A lot of people are interested in Talossan, it turns out.