No objection to this bill.

The abandoned tag is to comply with Lexhatx H.2.1.9.1; as you said, it's just bookkeeping and the tag carries no prejudice towards republishing an archived proposal, as H.2.1.9.1 itself states. (I've explained this already somewhere else but I can't find that reference right now.)

Compared to H.2.1.9.1, I've actually tried to be as fair to legislators as possible by also stipulating that, as an internal rule, a (non-joke) bill needs to have been passed up for Clarking at least twice to be sent to the archive and be tagged as abandoned.

By the letter of the law, the Charitable PermSec bill should technically be considered abandoned, but I consider my additional policy to be fairer; the bill was moved to committee on April 22, meaning it became Clarkable on time for the June Clark and this is therefore the second and final chance at Clarking.

I would replace "2.2. All Immigration applications shall be written in one of the national languages." by "2.2. All Immigration applications shall be written in Talossan or in English.", as I am not sure that national languages are defined as such (see Article I Section 2 or 5 of the OrgLaw.)

Sorry for my late answer on this.
I think this bill lacks the usual formalism (whereas, be replaced by, ..)
Two bills instead of one would allow to vote separately on 1.2.5. addition and 1.2.1 modification.

I'll be traveling today, but will give these some scrutiny tonight. Thank you for your patience.

Yeah, I thought they probably had been in there long enough. The abandoned thing was weird, but it's really just a bookkeeping thing and doesn't actually have any effect on anything.

Thank you!

Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on June 28, 2025, 08:09:30 AMI very much hope we will embrace this opportunity.

We will, I'll make sure of that.

I very much hope we will embrace this opportunity.

Quote from: King Txec on June 27, 2025, 07:41:56 PMAzul @Barclamïu da Miéletz, I received the following email today and thought you might be interested:

QuoteRequest for a Talossan license plate or national emblem for museum display

Dear Government of the Kingdom of Talossa,

My name is Piotr Piersa, and I am the founder and curator of the License Plate and Vehicle Museum in Żeliszew, Poland — the only museum of its kind in our country and one of only two in Europe.

Our museum is dedicated to preserving and showcasing the history and symbolism of license plates and transportation identity from around the world — including unique and symbolic contributions from self-declared nations and micronations.

We are currently preparing our permanent exhibition, and we would be honored to include the Kingdom of Talossa in our international and cultural section. We would be deeply grateful for the possibility of receiving:
- A symbolic Talossan license plate, emblem, or national sign
- Or any representation of Talossa's unique identity (even digital artwork or documentation)

Our collection has been featured in national Polish television and media (TVP1 – Teleexpress), and we maintain a digital archive of press and photos on our website.

Such an addition would celebrate the creativity and global spirit of Talossa, and inspire our visitors with the richness of cultural self-expression.

I haven't replied yet as I thought I'd run it by my fellow Talossans first.

-Txec R

We're getting more and more recognised, I'm amazed.

Yes, both of those bills are Clarkable. I archived The Charitable PermSec, Again Act by mistake (I probably checked the initial submission date). Both it and the Sentient Rights Act have passed the Hopper by the provisions of H.2.1.6, having laid in committee for thirty days.