News:

Welcome to Wittenberg!

Main Menu
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - þerxh Sant-Enogat

#1
Thanks for the new process
RZ20, per.
RZ21, contra (nice work, but I don't see real benefits - and the current process is more in line with what happens irl)
RZ22, per.
RZ23, per.
RZ24, per.
VoC, non.
#2
La C'hronică is today the theme of our propaganda, on X/Twitter LinkedIn Instagram Facebook and  Reddit
#3
Thanks for this new issue Mic'haglh, always useful to recap what is happening in our Kingdom. I'll post it on social media tomorrow.
#4
Is 'junior minister' defined somewhere ? Apart from this, clear for me, no other objection
#5
No objections on my side either
#6
This week, a reminder that immigration is still possible in our Kingdom : X/TwitterLinkedInFacebookReddit and  Instagram
#7
No objection on the Bill if it includes your latest version of Article VI, Section 10.

A suggestion on Article VII, Section 8 : could we replace "if at the end of any Clark the "no" vote outnumbers the "yes" vote, the Leader of the Opposition shall become Seneschal." By "If at the end of any Clark the "no" vote outnumbers the "yes" vote, the Leader of the Opposition shall nominate the Seneschal, whether themselves or someone else who accepts"
#8
no objections from the technical point of view of the quality of the legislation, the correctness of the language, the internal consistency of the document and the consistency with existing legislation
#9
Today's messages about TMT20 2025 edition on FacebookX/TwitterInstgramLinkedIn and  Reddit.
As usual, like and share these posts !
#10
No objection.
#11
On the last article, the definition of Opposition currently includes DIEN, despite being classified as "External support" (see the Wiki entry related to current Cosa).
What happens if the 2 biggest Opposition parties have the same number of seats ? Should there be a vote among Opposition MCs between the 2 leaders, followed by a toss if a tie ?
#12
non blocking remark : Even if Section 5 of Article VIII of OrgLaw is not that clear on Inactivity, I think we should make it clearer in the law and replace "In accordance with the appropriate section" by "In accordance with Section 5 of this Article".
Approved then.
#13
Is the current 1.2.2 related to the Bureau of the Census replaced by the current 1.2.1 ? i.e. is this bill also about the suppression of the Bureau of Census ?
if not, the current 1.2.2 should be renumbered 1.2.3, and a new 1.2.4 should be created with your proposal of replacement for 1.2.3
#14
Wittenberg / Re: Talossan Space Agency proposal
January 07, 2025, 12:53:17 PM
Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN on January 07, 2025, 12:44:42 PMThat stupid, snickery name sums up everything that infuriated me about the RUMP era of Talossa.
I also prefer COFFEE to BEER (dry january...)
#15
Wittenberg / Re: Talossan Space Agency proposal
January 07, 2025, 12:43:49 PM
https://wiki.talossa.com/Bureau_of_Space_Exploration_and_Rocketry
It's not the first time, but it's a very good idea to revive this !