News:

Welcome to Wittenberg!

Main Menu
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - King Txec

#1
Maricopa / Re: Electing a Premieir - 62nd Cosa
Yesterday at 08:38:27 AM
Quote from: Carlüs Éovart Vilaçafat on Yesterday at 08:23:42 AMI don't see how Article 1.6 of the Maricopa constitution is not a blanket ban, but I'm also no lawyer.

With that being said, I have no problem kicking the nomination of @Béneditsch Ardpresteir over to the Cabana to decide.

I thought BenArd was talking about your nomination not getting a vote. Our laws do indeed bar him from being Premieir.

-Txec R
#2
Wittenberg / Re: [Royal] Royal Regalia
December 21, 2025, 10:23:23 PM
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on July 29, 2025, 11:42:23 PMIncidentally, my wife is a very talented sewist, if it would be helpful to have someone adjust the sash to close it up at the right angle for your measurements.

Perhaps after the Living Cosa, I can send the sash to you for your wife to close up?

-Txec R
#3
Wittenberg / Re: [Royal] Royal Regalia
December 21, 2025, 10:17:50 PM
Quote from: Mximo Malt on December 21, 2025, 05:40:25 PMIsn't the "crown" just a general's hat, Your Majesty?

Actually, it is a train conductors hat.

-Txec R
#4
Wouldn't it be better if we operated our Wiki the way Wikipedia does instead of potentially criminalizing edits to TW?

-Txec R
#5
El Funal/The Hopper / Re: Public Records Minister
December 21, 2025, 11:23:45 AM
I think that roles such as A-X, MinImm, MinFin, and MinFor should be a statutory minimum. There may be more, but there are several jobs that should carry the weight of Cabinet level and also be subject to Terps and the like.

-Txec R
#6
Wittenberg / Re: [Govt] Appointments to the Cabinet
December 21, 2025, 09:28:00 AM
#7
Wittenberg / Re: [Govt] Appointments to the Cabinet
December 21, 2025, 09:26:54 AM
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on December 19, 2025, 12:52:48 PMLegally, you can't be in the Cabinet and a permanent secretary at the same time.  Actually, just to be safe: this is my official request to His Majesty that they be technically dismissed from service as permanent secretaries.  And I will reinstate them in their positions with no change in terms or scope as soon as it is legally possible.

With thanks for a job well done, we hereby dismiss, at the request of the Seneschal, Danihel Txechescu and þerxh Sant-Enogat from their respective positions as permanent secretaries.

-Txec R
#8
Quote from: Andrïeu Cabischabuerg on December 20, 2025, 07:41:35 PMWhat is OAF?

If is our entry level fellow, the Oblivious Auditing Fellow.

-Txec R/REH
#9
Wittenberg / Re: [Govt] Appointments to the Cabinet
December 20, 2025, 02:10:42 PM
I will post the formal Letters Patent when I am able to, but you may consider all of your appointments as made by me official.

-Txec R
#10
Maricopa / Re: Electing a Premieir - 62nd Cosa
December 19, 2025, 06:35:00 PM
Yes, a vote should have occurred under 59CL1.

-Txec R
#11
Wittenberg / Re: [Govt] Hiring: Clerk of Corts
December 19, 2025, 12:59:49 PM
Another thing to consider is the Baron asked me because I am a member of the Royal Bar as a practicing attorney and I was also once on the Uppermost Cort and prior to that the Magistrates Cort. I'm still a lawyer, though I don't do much with it, but being legal-minded has served me well on the throne as well as my prior role as Secretary of State.

-Txec R
#12
Wittenberg / Re: [Govt] Hiring: Clerk of Corts
December 19, 2025, 12:57:31 PM
Quote from: Mximo Malt on December 19, 2025, 12:55:33 PM
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on December 19, 2025, 12:54:29 PMWell, we're basically being silly since I don't think I ever issued any orders to His Majesty.  The king graciously agreed to be my deputy just in case I became unable to do the job.
If that were to happen (theoretically), who would inherit the Talossan throne?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm not going anywhere. If I did have to perform any duties, it would be as Deputy and would not interfere in any way with my reign.

-Txec R
#13
Wittenberg / Re: [Govt] Hiring: Clerk of Corts
December 19, 2025, 12:56:16 PM
Quote from: Mximo Malt on December 19, 2025, 12:47:25 PM
Quote from: King Txec on December 19, 2025, 12:42:01 PMIf you've ever wanted to be the boss of a king, now is your chance haha!

-Txec R
Aren't YOU supposed to be the boss, Your Majesty?

- MM

(I don't think your reign is illegitimate, I'm just pointing out the main job of a king. If you don't want any extra power, that's perfectly fine.)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

S:reu Malt,

Not long after I ascended the throne, the Baron, who was Clerk of Courts, asked me to step in as Deputy in the event that he could not fulfill the role. I agreed as there was no Organic restriction against a Monarch serving in this capacity.

I think perhaps you are missing the joke here. I really have no role and have not done anything in relation to it since I was appointed. It has nothing to do with extra power or being Head of State. What is ironic is that whomever takes over as Clerk of Courts would technically, in this VERY limited situation, be someone I reported to. It's funny - at least to me.

-Txec R
#14
Wittenberg / Re: [Govt] Hiring: Clerk of Corts
December 19, 2025, 12:42:01 PM
If you've ever wanted to be the boss of a king, now is your chance haha!

-Txec R
#15
The phrase "at the head of races" makes me shudder.

-Txec R
#16
Wittenberg / Re: [Royal] Appointment of a Seneschal
December 18, 2025, 04:55:32 PM
Quote from: Baron Alexandreu Davinescu on December 18, 2025, 03:50:53 PMZoom, unless His Majesty is interested in a drive.  (I have a spare room and it's beautiful where I live!)

The East Coast is quite lovely, but all things considered, I don't expect I'll be driving the 3,000 miles at this time. Zoom is far more convenient and we can have people from all over the world join in!

-Txec R
#17
Wittenberg / [Royal] Appointment of a Seneschal
December 17, 2025, 03:27:36 PM
#18
As someone who has been in all three roles that permit advisory opinions, my thoughts are that while it may be seen by some as ad hoc legislating, these types of opinions are definitely useful in certain cases. Not every official has an attorney on staff, and not every official is an attorney. I would support removing so-called advisory opinions but it would be useful if someone like the Chancellor or the Bar or some other lawyerly type was available to provide guidance in cases that don't rise to the high bar of the Cort pu Inalt.

On the other hand, this removal also gives even less work to the already very light work of the Cort. Just some thoughts from one who has been at all levels, including the Cort.

-Txec R
#19
Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN-GC on December 16, 2025, 02:00:27 PMSorry, not a member of el Coletx, but can I just add here that it drives me wild when people (usually US Americans) think titles of knighthood "Sir"/"Dame" is a title which goes with a surname, not a first name. Elton John and Paul McCartney are referred to as "Sir Elton" and "Sir Paul" respectively.

It bugs me too and as the font of all Talossan honours, I always call knights or dames "Sir John" or "Dame Judy."

-Txec R
#20
L'Óspileu/The Chat Room / Re: 2025-26 Fantasy Hockey
December 15, 2025, 01:05:48 PM
Quote from: Tric'hard Lenxheir on December 15, 2025, 12:18:44 PMI'm starting to think everyone is afraid of beating the King...might get kicked out of the country LOL

Nah, I don't have the power to do that...but I can stare at the insubordinate citizen and shake my head at them!

-Txec R