Welcome to Wittenberg!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Sir Ian Plätschisch on Today at 06:51:45 AMI have always found "reactionary" to be an interesting word, in that it implies the "reactionary" lacks a positive case for their own position and exists solely in opposition.
Quote from: Iac Éovard Valadeir on Yesterday at 05:48:15 PM61RZ01-Per
61RZ02-Per
61RZ03-Per
As a sidenote, the database refused to log me in. Im not sure why
Quote from: King Txec on May 05, 2025, 04:34:49 PMOne thing I regret from my time as SoS was not codifying Wittiquette into El. Lex. As it is now, Wittiquette is just a set of rules that can easily be changed. If they were written into El. Lex as a set of rules/guidelines they would be more difficult to change.
Also, they should be accompanied by a list of penalties such as (examples only):
- First offense: A written warning / post may be locked or removed
- Second offense: Account locked from posting for 24 hours
- Third offense: Account locked from posting for seven days
- Fourth offense: Account permanently locked from posting except for X boards.
QuotePublic personages are unfortunately subject (and often easy targets) to public attack/scorn/harassment/etc. Sometimes the "attacker" feels justified, and I'm not addressing that. It's not ideal but it is the reality when there is a public square like Wittenberg. The moment that language crosses into libel or trolling, then there are remedies (see above for trolling) and the Corts for libel.
Quote from: King Txec on May 05, 2025, 12:08:19 PMThe first thing I did was to thoroughly re-read the rules of Wittiquette. Did S:reu Tzaracomprada's comments violate any portion? Was it abusive language? Not really. To me, abusive language is calling someone a name or making a threat. Was it being a troll? Not at first, no. It was icky, but not trollish. What his post DID violate, to me, wasn't Wittiquette per se, but the rules of general decency. He called Sir Luc cute (or something like that). He was called out for it, and he did not relent. His behavior then did become a bit trollish.
QuoteNow, I had another problem. S:reu Tzaracomprada had spent the better part of two years hassling me for a decision I had made early on in my tenure as SoS. Whether he was right or wrong is immaterial. I felt intimidated by the constancy of the "discussion" to the point where I felt I could not engage with S:reu Tzaracomprada effectively without giving up my level-headedness. It was at that point that I appointed a Deputy Secretary of State to assist in administering Witt. Naturally, this went off like a bomb and further complaints of bias were leveled against me. So what was the outcome? I gave up any attempt at moderating the offensive speech.
QuoteDuring this entire time, a paradox was underway. While S:reu Tzaracomprada was behaving thusly, he was also advocating for my elevation to the throne.
Quote from: Xheralt Del'Encradeir on May 04, 2025, 09:49:51 AMOf course, meeting live and discovering how discordant someone is in person can ALSO lead to ongoing (and permanent) problems. Ask me how I know.