Can I ask if there is a seconder for this motion to be discussed here in this convention?
Otherwise I will suggest it be tabled until the vote on the merger is held.
I am thinking that I will allow 24 hours of discussion on this, and after that, we will move directly to the merger vote.
Otherwise I will suggest it be tabled until the vote on the merger is held.
I am thinking that I will allow 24 hours of discussion on this, and after that, we will move directly to the merger vote.
Quote from: mpf on July 09, 2025, 06:30:44 AMI personally think that Senats candidates should be selected as follows, if there is more than one candidate:
50% of the vote is by members of the party within the province, and 50% of the vote is from members outside of the province.
Senators represent a province, sure, but they are also important safeguards for the Cosa.
Let's say that there are 3 members of the party in the province, and two of them are in a sort of fringe sub-branch. They propose one of them, while the party backs another.
They would get 2/3 in the province, which is 67%, but the rest of the party all vote for the other member (who has 1/3).
2/3 + 0 = 33.5% of the total vote
1/3 + 100 = 66.5% of the total vote.
The province still has a say, they are 50% of the vote, but that way, the party can make sure that the backed senate candidates trully represent the party.