I don't understand this bill, and I think 1st Whereas clause is not correct.
The first Whereas tells about a "sealing of discussions" that I understand as a prohibition to disclose info.. this is not the case currently, may be it will be, but only if the Bill "The Second Talossan Government Transparency (Repair) Act" is passed.
I also don't understand why this bill is needed, if something happens to the Royal Archivist, he may not be in position to appoint anyone..I think someone else (SoS ?) should be able to appoint someone else as stopgap.

Approved also

shouldn't it say "8.9 Automatic Governmental Information Transmittal" rather than "Automated" ?

Order !
(I always dreamt of yelling this).
The latest posts are indeed inadequate in this thread dedicated to voting, where Wittiquette is more than ever of utmost importance.
I'm sorry not to be able to use my moderator's rights on Tapatalk (I'm travelling without my laptop), can I ask our SoS or deputy to remove the latest exchange (including this post) from the thread and move them to another one ? Thanks

As to RZ14, The Making SoS Succession Easier Act, I vote per
As to RZ15, BHAID: Palestinian Children's Relief Act, I abstain (austaneu), I don't disagree but I think a debate on how to allocate our charity funds would be more democratic than "who proposes first has the right to choose"
As to RZ16, The Immigration Reform (Quality over Quantity), I vote contra. >I think that all applications should be visible for discussion to the people, without a filtering based on an personnal assessment, this is too much power (and work) for a MinImm.
As to the Vote of Confidence, I vote non

Approved, Glüc's last remarks point out real risks which I don't know how to adress in such a bill

Approved also

Approved also

I think the Amateurs on Ice are in !

Approved also

Quote from: Tric'hard Lenxheir on August 23, 2024, 02:01:13 PM(...) I am completely lost when it comes to the politics (or lack thereof) of my home province of Vuode. So weeding out dumb people like me might help.

If I may, you're far from dumb and you are very important for Talossa. Being bad at politics is managing to collect 6 votes for a party with 3 candidate MCs :-D

For me, the immigration motivation was clear because I was interested in Cézembre—my childhood place—being a province of Talossa, and I've been fascinated by the history of this micro-nation I read about a long time ago, and I wanted to be part of it.

During my initial interactions, I enjoyed chatting with some of you (who will recognize themselves). I was surprised that it's always the same people who take an interest in newcomers.

About Brooksing, I didn't feel like I was being approached for electoral reasons; I joined the party of those who had interacted with me.

I was also surprised to discover that the number of active citizens was that low, and that responsibilities can come on you very quickly ! And sometimes with the feeling that most of Talossa does not care about the time you spend on doing things..
 
More generally

It does take time to engage with new immigrants but from the comments they write in their immigration applications, it's easy to spot those who are genuinely interested compared to the casual ones.
Generally, those who are truly interested take the initiative to start conversations on Wittenberg.

Some people clearly wanted to immigrate just to get a new ID card. Maybe we should reserve this card for those who have been active for a while (should an ad hoc committee determine the level of activity?).
We could for instance consider an intermediate status, like an apprentice in some guilds, (or tourist visa holders ?) and rely on immigrants motivation to become full citizens after some compulsory stages ?

OK for me, except the reference to El Lexhatx B.14.7 - which should rather relate to El Lexhatx H.2.1 if I'm not wrong

Technically, a balance sheet details assets and liabilities.
I would therefore correct the sentence "1.5.6.3. a balance sheet which clearly lists all expenses linking them to the relative sheet items in the budget bills approved in the Cosa," as :
"1.5.6.3. an expense statement which clearly lists all expenses linking them to the relative expense items in the budget bills approved in the Cosa,"
Apart from this wording issue, OK for me.

Quote from: Miestră Schivă, UrN on August 11, 2024, 01:13:37 AMCan we move this on to the CRL?

Done